Users, Purchasers and Influencers
Most organizations identify their customers as one single entity. If a certain company is producing miniatures of racing cars its customer is going to be boys aged between 3 and 12 years right? Well, it is right, but only to a certain extent. Those young boys are certainly the “users” of the product, but they are not the only people involved in the buying process. Apart from the “users” you will also have the “purchasers”, who in this case will probably be the parents and the “influencers” who could be the close friends or family.
This three-fold division was proposed by Chan Kim and Renee Mauborgne in a Harvard Business Review paper titled “Creating New Market Space”. According to the authors, “while the three groups (users, purchasers and influencers) might overlap, they often differ.” Identifying the cases where the groups differ, in fact, could help companies to come up with successful innovations.
From users to influencers: World of Warcraft
Consider the online multi-player games segment. This market has been very fragmented over the past years. Despite the fact that multi-player games like Ultima Online or Everquest managed to create a loyal customer base none of them had a substantial market share and no software company could be seen as the clear leader.
One of the reasons for such fragmentation is arguably the marketing focus of the software companies. Most of them were paying attention exclusively to the “users”, meaning that they dedicated most of their time and energy creating a compelling user experience, beautiful scenarios, a vast collection of weapons and the like. While such user experience is one of the most important factors for the success of an online multi-player game it is not the only one.
Blizzard, a gaming software company founded in 1991 who created the successful strategy game called Warcraft, realized that other competitors were paying too much attention to “users” and neglecting the “influencers”. As a response, they developed an online multi-player game that would build on collaboration and micro-communities inside the game. Players would need to engage with other players to complete quests and create clans. The consequence was that users would have incentives to convince as many friends as possible to start playing the game also. Blizzard’s multi-player game, World of Warcraft, achieved a tremendous success and dominated the market segment, it has over 7,5 millions active players that pay a monthly subscription fee of $15 just to play the game.
From purchasers to users: Bloomberg
Kim and Mauborgne used the example of Bloomberg to illustrate how understanding better the “chain of buyers” can help a company to develop useful innovations. Until the mid 1980s the online market for financial information was dominated by Reuters and Tele-rate. Those two companies traditionally focused on the purchasers of the product, that is the IT managers of brokerage houses and investment organizations. The only characteristic that such IT managers were looking for was the standardization of the product, which in turn would determine how easily it could be installed and managed.
The decision to focus on the purchasers had its logic, after all those were the people handing out the cash. Bloomberg was not 100% convinced, though. As the authors wrote “traders and analysts, not IT managers, make or lose millions of dollars for their employees each day. Profit opportunities come from disparities in information. When markets are active, traders and analysts must make rapid decisions. Every second counts.”
Bloomberg’s innovation was therefore aimed at users rather than purchasers. The company developed a system that was much simpler to use and would incorporate the financial terms. Additionally it also had two monitors so that traders would be able to see all the necessary information without needing to switch between programs and it included analytical functions to accelerate the market analysis process. All those improvements made the overall product more efficient and user-friendly.
After some time traders and analysts inside investing firms started to pressure IT managers in favor of the Bloomberg terminals. Not surprisingly, Bloomberg managed to become one of the largest providers of online financial information in just 15 years.
Conclusion
Instead of looking for a single customer companies should identify the “chain of customers”, composed of users, purchasers and influencers. The office equipment industry has traditionally focused on the purchasers (corporate purchasing departments) just like the pharmaceutical industry focus predominantly on influencers (doctors). As Kim and Mauborgne argue “sometimes there is a strong economic rationale for this focus. But often it is the result of industry practices that have never been questioned.”
Email Subscription
I think this is strongly rooted in the fact that most cases back-office operations are streamlined to meet the their current customers needs. A shift in the target customer is not possible without a tremendous change in the rest of the company as well.
Take a look at Wellpoint healt insurance. They shifted their customer segment from large companies to both large, small companies and individuals. This was not possible for the rest of the companies in the industry due to fact that their back-office operations where designed to meet the needs of large companies and economics of scale. Wellpoint created different back-office’s for each of their target customer segment. This is a risky operations, but they shifted the industry and went from nearly havoc to a cash machine for their shareholders.
I think entrepreneurs face some great opportunities if they look at an industry and reason backwards from the customer segment into theyr back-office, constructing it to better serve unmet customer needs.
This was maybe a bit outside this topic….but I postet it anyways:)
Christian, I think as you pointed out that many factors inside corporations limit their vision upon what should or could be considered a “customer”, expanding and getting rid of those barriers is the difficult task
Very interesting the story about Warcraft.
[…] Daniel Scocco presents Users, Purchasers and Influencers posted at Innovation Zen. […]
A small note to add on the pharmaceutical industry - I think there has been a paradigm shift over the last 7-8 years. Now the industry has focussed on the user - commercials and ad campaigns directly influence the consumer who in turn influence the doctors to prescribe these medicines.. so the user is the influencer .. often! Same with office equipment companies - here bluk pricing drives the purchasing dept and mostly dictates the choice of vendors and volumes. However, if the companies come with innovative products that influence the operations of the users, the pressure often comes from the users and influencers ( managers ).
http://innovech.wordpress.com
In order to sustain a self in these circumstances one should know the proper rules of ergonomics.
hello friends first of all I want to know how to make this type blog. I want to make a this type blog where people come can disscuss and give us his opinion than we get more knowledge. http://www.weightlossdietpillz.com
I am impressed to see this blog. There is a lots of imformation for me. I naver been seen this type infomative place . I m very thank full to the owner of this blog. http://www.cheapviagrabuy.com