<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brokering ideas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innovationzen.com/blog/index.php/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/</link>
	<description>Innovation Management, Business Strategy, Technology and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:44:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aisa Pereira</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-2081</link>
		<dc:creator>Aisa Pereira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 15:10:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/#comment-2081</guid>
		<description>The same goes to marketing and sales, especially if we are talking about software. The thorough study of what is already available, the alignment between strenghts and opportunities, a clear and differentiated positioning, the discipline to follow a methodology that helps sales and marketing people to define niches and offer an unique product or service: that´s innovation too..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The same goes to marketing and sales, especially if we are talking about software. The thorough study of what is already available, the alignment between strenghts and opportunities, a clear and differentiated positioning, the discipline to follow a methodology that helps sales and marketing people to define niches and offer an unique product or service: that´s innovation too..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger von Oech</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-1532</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger von Oech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/#comment-1532</guid>
		<description>Daniel,

Thorough and thought-provoking, as usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel,</p>
<p>Thorough and thought-provoking, as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Scocco</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-1504</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Scocco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 17:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/#comment-1504</guid>
		<description>Chris,

Thanks for the exhaustive comment, I will certainly dig more about Alph Bingham.

Regarding Larry Huston from P&amp;G, I am also a big fan of his work, and I will try to write my view on his innovation strategy on the near future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,</p>
<p>Thanks for the exhaustive comment, I will certainly dig more about Alph Bingham.</p>
<p>Regarding Larry Huston from P&#038;G, I am also a big fan of his work, and I will try to write my view on his innovation strategy on the near future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Flanagan</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/comment-page-1/#comment-1503</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Flanagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 14:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/11/28/brokering-ideas/#comment-1503</guid>
		<description>I’m a big fan of Andrew Hargadon. His HBS essay builds on his book from a couple years ago - How Breakthroughs Happen. He&#039;s on our advisory board so I had the opportunity to interview him a while back on this concept of technology brokering. Basically he believes that organizations today are too fixated on invention. Successful innovators, he says, do not invent, they recombine. And they do it openly, not secretly. 

Which plays into what Larry Huston of P&amp;G is doing with his Connect + Develop model. I wrote an &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessinnovationfactory.com/images/stories/newsletter/larry%20huston%20interview%20-%20october%202006.pdf&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;article &lt;/a&gt;about Huston which contains a couple of great quotes I use often. The first - which reflects your point about specificity and asking the right questions - 

&lt;blockquote&gt;“You need to get really clear on what you’re looking for and how value gets created,” says Huston. “Look for things with a pedigree and a reason to believe. Here at P&amp;G, we’re looking for solutions that solve a consumer problem and are ready to go. Without proof of concept, we don’t move forward.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The second quote is that Huston is very clear that Connect + Develop is not an idea factory:
&lt;blockquote&gt;“The reality,” he says, “is that the world is filled with great ideas. We want ideas filled with solutions—we want a solutions factory.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I have a couple of suggestions for further follow-up if you’re interested. First is Alph Bingham of Innocentive. He spoke at our summit last month and you can see his video &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessinnovationfactory.com/innovationstorystudio/bif2_bingham.php&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;. He presented a great metaphorical question: are you organized for Edison or Archimedes?

I also recently blogged about Bingham and his model. You can check it out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.businessinnovationfactory.com/weblog/archives/2006/11/are_you_picasso_1.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.

Best, Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m a big fan of Andrew Hargadon. His HBS essay builds on his book from a couple years ago &#8211; How Breakthroughs Happen. He&#8217;s on our advisory board so I had the opportunity to interview him a while back on this concept of technology brokering. Basically he believes that organizations today are too fixated on invention. Successful innovators, he says, do not invent, they recombine. And they do it openly, not secretly. </p>
<p>Which plays into what Larry Huston of P&amp;G is doing with his Connect + Develop model. I wrote an <a href="http://www.businessinnovationfactory.com/images/stories/newsletter/larry%20huston%20interview%20-%20october%202006.pdf" rel="nofollow">article </a>about Huston which contains a couple of great quotes I use often. The first &#8211; which reflects your point about specificity and asking the right questions &#8211; </p>
<blockquote><p>“You need to get really clear on what you’re looking for and how value gets created,” says Huston. “Look for things with a pedigree and a reason to believe. Here at P&amp;G, we’re looking for solutions that solve a consumer problem and are ready to go. Without proof of concept, we don’t move forward.”</p></blockquote>
<p>The second quote is that Huston is very clear that Connect + Develop is not an idea factory:</p>
<blockquote><p>“The reality,” he says, “is that the world is filled with great ideas. We want ideas filled with solutions—we want a solutions factory.”</p></blockquote>
<p>I have a couple of suggestions for further follow-up if you’re interested. First is Alph Bingham of Innocentive. He spoke at our summit last month and you can see his video <a href="http://www.businessinnovationfactory.com/innovationstorystudio/bif2_bingham.php" rel="nofollow">here</a>. He presented a great metaphorical question: are you organized for Edison or Archimedes?</p>
<p>I also recently blogged about Bingham and his model. You can check it out <a href="http://www.businessinnovationfactory.com/weblog/archives/2006/11/are_you_picasso_1.html" rel="nofollow">here</a>.</p>
<p>Best, Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

