<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Incremental vs. Radical Innovation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innovationzen.com/blog/index.php/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/</link>
	<description>Innovation Management, Business Strategy, Technology and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 16:44:36 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taylor</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-34369</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 09:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/#comment-34369</guid>
		<description>I am curious with your Kodak example because it is also quite relevant to the Henderson model. 

Is anyone aware who invented the digital camera?

It was an in house member of Kodak who stayed within the company and developed the product. 

Now given that hederson says:
“Incumbents invested more in incremental innovation and gained a larger market share as a function of historical market power, and they were significantly less productive than entrants in their attempts to introduce innovations that were radical in the sense that they made their existing capabilities obsolete.” P.267-268

It flys in the face of Kodak developing and implementing one of the most radical inventions of our time: the digital camera. 

I think this is where the dahlin-behrens method really should be recognized as the best method to identify radical innvention and radical innovation....

thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am curious with your Kodak example because it is also quite relevant to the Henderson model. </p>
<p>Is anyone aware who invented the digital camera?</p>
<p>It was an in house member of Kodak who stayed within the company and developed the product. </p>
<p>Now given that hederson says:<br />
“Incumbents invested more in incremental innovation and gained a larger market share as a function of historical market power, and they were significantly less productive than entrants in their attempts to introduce innovations that were radical in the sense that they made their existing capabilities obsolete.” P.267-268</p>
<p>It flys in the face of Kodak developing and implementing one of the most radical inventions of our time: the digital camera. </p>
<p>I think this is where the dahlin-behrens method really should be recognized as the best method to identify radical innvention and radical innovation&#8230;.</p>
<p>thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innovation Management Theory - Round Up</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-478</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovation Management Theory - Round Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/#comment-478</guid>
		<description>[...] Incremental vs. Radical Innovation [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Incremental vs. Radical Innovation [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innovation Management Theory - Part 5</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovation Management Theory - Part 5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Aug 2006 12:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/#comment-86</guid>
		<description>[...] So far we have already covered three models that analyse what companies will be in a better position to innovate and under what circumstances (Schumpeter, the Incremental – Radical dichotomy and the Henderson – Clark model) and one framework that outlines the introduction, growth and maturation of innovations and technological cycles (the S-Curve framework). In the fifth part of the series I will present the Teece model, which can be used to predict who will profit from an innovation and to understand what company will have higher incentives to invest in certain innovations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So far we have already covered three models that analyse what companies will be in a better position to innovate and under what circumstances (Schumpeter, the Incremental – Radical dichotomy and the Henderson – Clark model) and one framework that outlines the introduction, growth and maturation of innovations and technological cycles (the S-Curve framework). In the fifth part of the series I will present the Teece model, which can be used to predict who will profit from an innovation and to understand what company will have higher incentives to invest in certain innovations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innovation Zen - Management, Business Strategy, Technology and more</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovation Zen - Management, Business Strategy, Technology and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2006 17:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/#comment-60</guid>
		<description>[...] In the first three parts of the series we have covered three static models of the innovation management theory: Schumpeter, the Incremental – Radical dichotomy and the Henderson - Clark model (if you have not you can click here to read part 1, part 2 or part 3). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In the first three parts of the series we have covered three static models of the innovation management theory: Schumpeter, the Incremental – Radical dichotomy and the Henderson &#8211; Clark model (if you have not you can click here to read part 1, part 2 or part 3). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Innovation Zen - Management, Business Strategy, Technology and more</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>Innovation Zen - Management, Business Strategy, Technology and more</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 12:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/08/04/innovation-management-theory-part-2/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] As we have seen in the part 2 the first widely recognized theory to appear was the Incremental - Radical innovation dichotomy (click here to read the second part). Although the model explained many innovation patterns and presented strong empirical evidence we have seen that over the last decades, with the advent of the Information and Communication technologies and with the acceleration of change in most industries the model lost some of its reliability. In this part we will cover the Henderson - Clark model, which complemented to a great extent the Incremental - Radical dichotomy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As we have seen in the part 2 the first widely recognized theory to appear was the Incremental &#8211; Radical innovation dichotomy (click here to read the second part). Although the model explained many innovation patterns and presented strong empirical evidence we have seen that over the last decades, with the advent of the Information and Communication technologies and with the acceleration of change in most industries the model lost some of its reliability. In this part we will cover the Henderson &#8211; Clark model, which complemented to a great extent the Incremental &#8211; Radical dichotomy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

