<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Competitive Advantage: Introduction</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innovationzen.com/blog/index.php/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/</link>
	<description>Innovation Management, Business Strategy, Technology and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Divikiran</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-11883</link>
		<dc:creator>Divikiran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 07:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/#comment-11883</guid>
		<description>hi 

  i am divikiran,, i am a student of ERP recently i have started my research on Michael Porter&#039;s work. can any buddy guide me to get best material to read which can explain me right from the beginning and with all his mechanism.

thinking you
Divikiran Ravela</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi </p>
<p>  i am divikiran,, i am a student of ERP recently i have started my research on Michael Porter&#8217;s work. can any buddy guide me to get best material to read which can explain me right from the beginning and with all his mechanism.</p>
<p>thinking you<br />
Divikiran Ravela</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Competitive Advantage: Economies of Scale</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-4305</link>
		<dc:creator>Competitive Advantage: Economies of Scale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 22:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/#comment-4305</guid>
		<description>[...] Competitive Advantage: Economies of Scale   The first part of this series (click here to read) explained that there are basically two types of competitive advantage: cost advantage and differentiation advantage. For the next few posts we will cover all the sources that can create a cost advantage for a company. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Competitive Advantage: Economies of Scale   The first part of this series (click here to read) explained that there are basically two types of competitive advantage: cost advantage and differentiation advantage. For the next few posts we will cover all the sources that can create a cost advantage for a company. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Scocco</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-3567</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Scocco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 09:22:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/#comment-3567</guid>
		<description>Subbaraman,

I agree when you say that &quot;Porter’s theory has been disproved time and again&quot;, but you have to be careful about what theories you talk about, since Porter had many of them.

If you consider his theory about strategy formulation for instance, he defended that stratigic planning must be carried before entering a certain industry and it must be based on analysis and models. Henry Mintzberg proved that this method is very innefective in many industries, creating a new school of thought.

That said, Porter&#039;s theory about competitive advantage is one of his most solid theories (in fact by your comment it is not clear to me what is your criticism about that theory). Appart from cost advanatge and differentiation advantage he also added a third via called &quot;focus&quot; strategy when companies have an advantage by service niche markets. Now, can you name a couple of sources of competitive advantage that do no fall inside one of those 3 categories?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Subbaraman,</p>
<p>I agree when you say that &#8220;Porter’s theory has been disproved time and again&#8221;, but you have to be careful about what theories you talk about, since Porter had many of them.</p>
<p>If you consider his theory about strategy formulation for instance, he defended that stratigic planning must be carried before entering a certain industry and it must be based on analysis and models. Henry Mintzberg proved that this method is very innefective in many industries, creating a new school of thought.</p>
<p>That said, Porter&#8217;s theory about competitive advantage is one of his most solid theories (in fact by your comment it is not clear to me what is your criticism about that theory). Appart from cost advanatge and differentiation advantage he also added a third via called &#8220;focus&#8221; strategy when companies have an advantage by service niche markets. Now, can you name a couple of sources of competitive advantage that do no fall inside one of those 3 categories?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subbaraman Iyer</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/comment-page-1/#comment-3556</link>
		<dc:creator>Subbaraman Iyer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 03:54:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2007/01/24/competitive-advantage-introduction/#comment-3556</guid>
		<description>http://subbaiyer.wordpress.com/tag/business/competition/

While Porter&#039;s work is revolutionary, it doesn&#039;t completely explain competitive advantage and competitive factors. remember Porter&#039;s theory has been disproved time and again, in various industries and contexts, more in the high tech world.

Porter (with all due respects to him) saw this primarily from an economics standpoint, and hence his view is limiting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://subbaiyer.wordpress.com/tag/business/competition/" rel="nofollow">http://subbaiyer.wordpress.com/tag/business/competition/</a></p>
<p>While Porter&#8217;s work is revolutionary, it doesn&#8217;t completely explain competitive advantage and competitive factors. remember Porter&#8217;s theory has been disproved time and again, in various industries and contexts, more in the high tech world.</p>
<p>Porter (with all due respects to him) saw this primarily from an economics standpoint, and hence his view is limiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
