<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Innovation is a 2-level game</title>
	<atom:link href="http://innovationzen.com/blog/index.php/2006/09/13/innovation-is-a-2-level-game/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/09/13/innovation-is-a-2-level-game/</link>
	<description>Innovation Management, Business Strategy, Technology and more!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:22:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2-Speed - &#187; As a Company Evolves, So Must Its Leadership</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/09/13/innovation-is-a-2-level-game/comment-page-1/#comment-5673</link>
		<dc:creator>2-Speed - &#187; As a Company Evolves, So Must Its Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2007 02:05:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/09/13/innovation-is-a-2-level-game/#comment-5673</guid>
		<description>[...] Daniel Scocco over at Innovation Zen has written a great post titled, Innovation is a 2-Level Game.&#160; The post discusses how the leadership, management, structural and innovational needs of a company change over time and how those changing needs are often ignored.&#160; From the post: &#8220;For example take the Forbes 100 Index between 1917 and 1987; out of the 100 companies ranked in the starting year 61 ceased to exist and only 18 managed to stay in the list, of those 16 underperformed the market average (7.5%). Only General Electric (7.8%) and Eastman Kodak (7.7%) managed to generate returns above the average.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daniel Scocco over at Innovation Zen has written a great post titled, Innovation is a 2-Level Game.&nbsp; The post discusses how the leadership, management, structural and innovational needs of a company change over time and how those changing needs are often ignored.&nbsp; From the post: &#8220;For example take the Forbes 100 Index between 1917 and 1987; out of the 100 companies ranked in the starting year 61 ceased to exist and only 18 managed to stay in the list, of those 16 underperformed the market average (7.5%). Only General Electric (7.8%) and Eastman Kodak (7.7%) managed to generate returns above the average.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2-Speed : As a Company Evolves, So Must Its Leadership</title>
		<link>http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/09/13/innovation-is-a-2-level-game/comment-page-1/#comment-325</link>
		<dc:creator>2-Speed : As a Company Evolves, So Must Its Leadership</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 15:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://innovationzen.com/blog/2006/09/13/innovation-is-a-2-level-game/#comment-325</guid>
		<description>[...] Daniel Scocco over at Innovation Zen has written a great post titled, Innovation is a 2-Level Game.&#160; The post discusses how the leadership, management, structural and innovational needs of a company change over time and how those changing needs are often ignored.&#160; From the post: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daniel Scocco over at Innovation Zen has written a great post titled, Innovation is a 2-Level Game.&nbsp; The post discusses how the leadership, management, structural and innovational needs of a company change over time and how those changing needs are often ignored.&nbsp; From the post: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
